The main standard beta coefficient (? = 0

The main standard beta coefficient (? = 0

The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve https://datingranking.net/it/incontri-per-nudisti/ the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.

The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.

Practitioners which have good constructivist epistemology tended to place far more emphasis on the non-public bond regarding therapeutic relationships compared to the therapists with a great rationalist epistemology

The modern study showed that therapist epistemology is actually a life threatening predictor with a minimum of specific regions of the functional alliance. The best wanting was at regards to the development of an effective personal thread between your consumer and you will counselor (Bond subscale). It aids the notion throughout the literary works one to constructivist therapists place an increased increased exposure of building a good therapeutic dating described as, “acceptance, knowledge, faith, and compassionate.

Theory step 3-your choice of Certain Therapeutic Treatments

The third and you may last data was designed to target the fresh prediction one epistemology might possibly be a great predictor out of counselor use of certain therapy processes. Much more particularly, your rationalist epistemology often report having fun with process of this cognitive behavioural cures (e.g. suggestions giving) over constructivist epistemologies, and you will therapists with constructivist epistemologies often statement using techniques from the constructivist therapy (e.g. emotional processing) more than practitioners having rationalist epistemologies). A parallel linear regression study is actually presented to determine should your predictor changeable (therapist epistemology) tend to influence counselor recommendations of the standards variables (cures processes).

Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.

Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.

Kategória: incontri-per-nudisti visitors | A közvetlen link.

Vélemény, hozzászólás?

Az e-mail-címet nem tesszük közzé. A kötelező mezőket * karakterrel jelöltük